You
Set the priorities. Bring your judgement to the conversations and decisions that need your involvement.
A new mandate or ambition may require people beyond your current network. We help identify those relationships, prepare a credible route and support a useful first exchange.
The right new relationship has a reason to exist: a decision to understand, a contribution to offer or an opportunity to explore together.
Building starts with that relevance: a chair whose board needs your experience, a partner entering a market you understand or a leader shaping a new business.
The route depends on the person: a trusted introduction, direct email, industry conversation, private gathering or useful research. Public work can support credibility where it helps explain your contribution.
Before either engine begins, agree a short outcome brief: the intended result, contribution offered, relevant people, time horizon, current evidence, exclusions, executive sponsor and decision rights. Confirm the relationship owner, approved channels, materials and permissions. Corporate and personal mandates have distinct access and reporting boundaries.
This preparation also supports Conversion. Both engines can run in parallel while Building addresses specific gaps.
Explore ConversionBegin at the first unmet step and record what is already established. A trusted introduction may satisfy two steps immediately. Pause when relevance or interest is absent.
Open a step for its output, responsibilities, progress evidence and shortcuts.
B4 establishes a reciprocal working relationship. C2 opens a conversation about the chosen outcome. C3 tests whether a specific opportunity is worth pursuing together.
A conversation about the chosen outcome has yet to begin.
A specific opportunity needs testing against contribution, timing and constraints.
Mutual fit and the next action are already confirmed.
Both parties welcome continuity without a current opportunity.
One relationship owner continues, with no repeated onboarding or requirement to buy a second product. An existing sponsor and a newly introduced participant can be at different steps within the same opportunity.
Fictional illustration. This example demonstrates the method; it is not a client result.
A global technology executive is exploring an independent board role in an adjacent sector. She has experience overseeing large operational transformations, but no working relationship with a relevant chair.
One relationship, considered in contextThe team identifies a board where transformation experience may be relevant. The executive confirms the interest and the relationship gap; the board's requirements still need verification.
An investor she knows agrees to introduce her to the chair. Together they prepare a short, accurate account of her governance experience and the reason for a conversation.
The investor makes the introduction. The chair responds and agrees to exchange perspectives on the company's current challenges.
They discuss those challenges and agree to continue. The executive now has a reciprocal relationship and an appropriate route for further contact.
Handoff: The chair raises a potential future board requirement. At C3, they can test the executive's experience against the actual mandate, timing and constraints. Any subsequent nomination process belongs at C4.
The investor remains an existing relationship managed through Conversion. The newly introduced chair begins in Building. One coordinated owner keeps both histories clear.
Set the priorities. Bring your judgement to the conversations and decisions that need your involvement.
Your chief of staff or nominated owner validates context, coordinates existing teams and exercises delegated approvals.
Research, drafting, conversation preparation, coordination and agreed reporting around the relationships in scope.
StepUp adds ongoing research and preparation capacity around your priorities. Your executive office and existing teams retain their mandates; authorised owners and specialists lead negotiations and formal processes.
Each person has one coordinated contact plan across authorised work. A potential investor may also be a useful board sponsor; those interests need a coherent conversation and appropriate boundaries.
Neither a publishing quota nor an elapsed-time threshold establishes readiness. The approach follows the recipient's context, the strength of the route and the evidence from each exchange.
Review three types of evidence separately.
Relevant people verified, routes prepared and approved approaches made.
Meaningful responses, substantive exchanges and appropriate continuation agreed.
Subsequent opportunity progress and the eventual outcome defined in the brief, with supporting evidence.
Show the next decision, responsible person and unresolved question. If a route is unsuitable or interest absent, record the reason and adjust or stop.
The people, route and useful first exchange change. The four steps remain the same.
Bring one priority. Discuss the intended outcome, existing relationships, missing connections and a sensible first action.